The Supreme Court will deliver its order
tomorrow on pleas seeking a stay of the directions passed on August 11 by a
two-judge bench directing the removal of stray dogs from Delhi and the National
Capital Region to shelter homes. A three-judge bench comprising Justice Vikram
Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice NV Anjaria reserved its decision after
hearing arguments on August 14.
The controversy began when a two-judge
bench consisting of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan took suo motu
cognisance of a news report published in the Delhi edition of The Times of
India on July 28 titled “City hounded by strays and kids pay price.” Acting on
this report, the bench issued sweeping directions on August 11 to remove stray
dogs from the streets and shift them to shelter facilities. These directions
were issued based on the suggestions of Senior Advocate and amicus curiae
Gaurav Agarwal.
However, in a dramatic turn on August 13,
the matter was reassigned to a three-judge bench after lawyers pointed out
before the Chief Justice of India that the August 11 directions conflicted with
earlier orders of other benches regarding the management of stray dogs. The
three-judge bench then heard the matter on August 14 and reserved its order on
whether the August 11 directions should be stayed.
In its August 11 ruling, the two-judge
bench directed the State of NCT of Delhi, along with the Municipal Corporation
of Delhi (MCD) and the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC), to immediately
establish dog shelters across the city and report on their progress within
eight weeks. These shelters were to have adequate personnel to care for
sterilised and immunised dogs, and also for those detained, who would not be
released back onto the streets. The shelters were to be equipped with CCTV
monitoring to ensure strict compliance. The bench further directed that
shelters for 5,000 dogs should be created within six to eight weeks as an
initial step, with a plan to gradually expand capacity. Authorities were
ordered to begin removing stray dogs from all localities, with a particular
focus on vulnerable areas and the outskirts of the city. The Court stressed
that this should be undertaken without compromise, and if necessary, a special
force could be created for the purpose. It also warned that any individual or organisation
obstructing the exercise would face strict action, including contempt
proceedings.
The bench justified these measures on the
ground of public interest, highlighting the need to protect infants and young
children from rabies and instil public confidence that roads and colonies could
be used without fear of dog bites. The Court observed that no sentiment should
interfere with the execution of the directions.
Additionally, the authorities of Noida,
Ghaziabad, and Gurugram were directed to maintain daily records of stray dogs
captured and housed, to be presented before the Court in the next hearing. The
Court made it clear that once picked up, no stray dog was to be released,
warning of stern action in case of violations.
The order also required the creation of a
helpline within one week to enable reporting of dog bite cases. Complaints
received through this helpline were to be acted upon within four hours, with
the concerned dog captured, sterilised, and immunised, and never released. The
Court further ordered that medical facilities be informed immediately so that
bite victims could receive timely treatment.
Finally, the bench addressed concerns about
vaccine shortages, directing authorities to provide detailed public information
about available vaccine stocks and their distribution. Any obstruction to the
effective implementation of these directions, it warned, would be treated as
contempt of court.
The matter is now set to be decided by the
three-judge bench, which will pronounce its order on August 22.