The Supreme Court has issued notice on a
writ petition seeking the adoption of digital technology for verification of
bail sureties, with the objective of preventing delays in the release of
prisoners who have already secured bail. The matter was heard by a bench
comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, which not only issued
notice to the concerned authorities but also impleaded the National Legal
Services Authority (NALSA) through its Member Secretary, recognizing the
importance of the issue from an access to justice perspective.
The petition has been filed by a senior
citizen, presently settled in Italy for over two decades. He was arrested in
January at the Delhi Domestic Airport under Sections 39, 49, and 51 of the Wild
Animal Protection Act, 1972, on allegations that he was transporting a deer
horn from Italy, said to be valued at around 20 euros. Although bail was
granted to him, his release was delayed due to the verification of sureties who
had travelled from Kerala to Delhi. This verification process caused him to
remain in jail for eight additional days after bail had already been granted.
The petitioner has highlighted that his
experience reflects a systemic issue faced by many accused persons in India.
According to him, the existing system of surety execution and verification is
outdated and cumbersome. Once bail is granted, the accused still faces
challenges because the surety is often required to travel from distant
locations, and the police must then visit these locations to verify the
credentials of the surety. Until this process is completed, the accused remains
incarcerated despite the bail order. The petitioner pointed out that in most
cases, courts tend to accept only sureties personally known to the accused,
which further complicates matters when the accused or surety is from another
state or abroad.
In his plea, the petitioner urged the Court
to direct the Union Government, the Government of Delhi, and the Delhi Police
to adopt modern technological solutions for surety verification. He argued that
digital verification would align with the needs of the current generation,
where individuals frequently travel across India and overseas. The use of
science and technology, he contended, would ensure that once bail is granted,
the subsequent release of the accused would not be unnecessarily delayed.
Beyond this systemic relief, the petitioner
has also sought certain individual remedies. These include the return of his
passport, which had been seized, as well as a modification of bail conditions
that presently restrict him from travelling abroad. He has additionally
requested an inquiry into alleged incidents of ill-treatment during his
incarceration in Tihar Jail.
Recognizing the larger implications of the
petition, the Supreme Court has sought responses from the relevant authorities
and directed NALSA to be involved in the proceedings. The matter has been
scheduled for further hearing on September 15, where the Court will consider
whether digital mechanisms can be introduced to reform the current system of
bail surety verification.